-
bob1234 5 years, 3 months ago
Constitutionally, that would be wrong! ALL PEOPLE are considered as INNOCENT until PROVEN GUILTY beyond a reasonable doubt. Refusing to submit to a government mandated test does NOT prove that ANYONE is “guilty” or, in this case, “positive”.
One other question: Is this more “merde” dreamed up by their governor? Governors do NOT mandate LAWS. LAWS can ONLY be created by LEGISLATURES! And to force a person to take a test “or else” is also forcing them to provide testimony against themselves. You cannot pervert our Constitution just because of medical concerns!Constitutionally, that would be wrong! ALL PEOPLE are considered as INNOCENT until PROVEN GUILTY beyond a reasonable doubt. Refusing to submit to a government mandated test does NOT prove that ANYONE is “guilty” or, in this case, “positive”.
One other question: Is this more “merde” dreamed up by their governor? Governors do NOT mandate LAWS. LAWS can ONLY be created by LEGISLATURES! And to force a person to take a test “or else” is also forcing them to provide testimony against themselves. You cannot pervert our Constitution just because of medical concerns!Constitutionally, that would be wrong! ALL PEOPLE are considered as INNOCENT until PROVEN GUILTY beyond a reasonable doubt. Refusing to submit to a government mandated test does NOT prove that ANYONE is “guilty” or, in this case, “positive”.
One other question: Is this more “merde” dreamed up by their governor? Governors do NOT mandate LAWS. LAWS can ONLY be created by LEGISLATURES! And to force a person to take a test “or else” is also forcing them to provide testimony against themselves. You cannot pervert our Constitution just because of medical concerns!
